Aligned but Not Partner-Specific: Distinguishing How Multimodal LLM Agents Succeed in Reference Games Without Human-Like Conventions

arXiv:2606.08081v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Repeated reference games test whether interlocutors replace their initially long descriptions with shorter, partner-specific conventions grounded in shared interaction history. Prior work shows that multimodal LLMs fail to become more efficient across rounds, although they align on the labels they use. How can we determine whether this alignment reflects partner-specific grounding rather than a shared task vocabulary? We address this question by comparing capable multimodal agent dyads with human dyads from the KTH Tangrams corpus. Our novel me

Source: arXiv cs.AI — read the full report at the original publisher.

This is a curated wire item. The Continuum Brief does not republish full third-party articles; this entry links to the original source.