arXiv:2604.19786v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Humor remains difficult to evaluate in large language models (LLMs) because what makes a response funny is subjective, comparative, and shaped by interacting comedic mechanisms rather than a single scalar property. Existing humor evaluation protocols therefore tend to produce isolated scores or task-specific judgments that are difficult to compare across models. We introduce HumorRank, a tournament-based framework for ranking textual humor generation through theory-grounded pairwise preference judgments. Across SemEval-2026 MWAHAHA and Humor
Source: arXiv cs.CL — read the full report at the original publisher.