arXiv:2606.03904v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-objective optimization (MOO) underlies many machine learning problems, yet MOO solvers across the loss-balancing, gradient-balancing, and Pareto-based families almost universally hand their reconciled directions to Adam~\cite{kingma2015adam}. We show this coupling introduces two systematic gaps between the solver's intent and the optimizer's execution. The first is a \emph{weighting mismatch}: Adam's second-moment denominator entangles the time-varying preference vector with gradient statistics, marginalizing the preference into a history a
Source: arXiv cs.LG — read the full report at the original publisher.