arXiv:2506.02075v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The current state of evaluation in survival analysis is plagued by the persistent use of evaluation metrics in ways that are misaligned with the stated modeling objective. In addition, many such evaluations are based on censoring assumptions that are left implicit or unjustified. This means that the reported performance can be misleading and may fail to answer the scientific or modeling question the evaluation was intended to address. In this position paper, we critically examine evaluation practices in survival analysis and highlight h
Source: arXiv cs.LG — read the full report at the original publisher.