SIGNALAI·Jun 25, 2026, 4:00 AMSignal75Medium term

Aligning Human-AI-Interaction Trust for Mental Health Support: Survey and Position for Multi-Stakeholders

Source: arXiv cs.CL

Share
Aligning Human-AI-Interaction Trust for Mental Health Support: Survey and Position for Multi-Stakeholders

arXiv:2604.20166v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Building trustworthy AI systems for mental health support is a shared priority across stakeholders from multiple disciplines. However, "trustworthy" remains loosely defined and inconsistently operationalized. AI research often focuses on technical criteria (e.g., robustness, explainability, and safety), while therapeutic practitioners emphasize therapeutic fidelity (e.g., appropriateness, empathy, and long-term user outcomes). To bridge the fragmented landscape, we propose a three-layer trust framework, covering human-oriented, AI-oriented, a

Why this matters
Why now

The proliferation of AI applications in sensitive domains like mental health necessitates a more rigorous and interdisciplinary definition of 'trustworthy' AI, which is currently fragmented across technical and therapeutic perspectives.

Why it’s important

Establishing a robust, multi-stakeholder framework for AI trust in mental health will accelerate safe and effective deployment while managing ethical risks and ensuring user adoption of these critical tools.

What changes

The explicit recognition of divergent 'trust' definitions between AI developers and therapeutic practitioners signals a maturation in the AI-human-interaction field, advocating for a consolidated framework.

Winners
  • · AI ethics researchers
  • · Mental health practitioners
  • · Patients receiving AI-assisted care
  • · Responsible AI developers
Losers
  • · Developers of non-transparent AI systems
  • · AI solutions lacking therapeutic grounding
  • · Patients subjected to untrustworthy AI
Second-order effects
Direct

Increased collaborative research between AI and mental health fields to operationalize trust frameworks.

Second

Development of new regulatory standards and certification processes for AI in sensitive applications like healthcare.

Third

Public confidence in AI-driven mental health support increases, leading to wider adoption and potential for scaled access to care.

Editorial confidence: 90 / 100 · Structural impact: 55 / 100
Original report

This signal links to a primary source. Continuum Brief monitors and indexes it as part of the live intelligence stream — we do not republish source content.

Read at arXiv cs.CL
Tracked by The Continuum Brief · live intelligence network
Share
The Brief · Weekly Dispatch

Stay ahead of the systems reshaping markets.

By subscribing, you agree to receive updates from THE CONTINUUM BRIEF. You can unsubscribe at any time.