arXiv:2601.15797v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many theorists maintain that conscious intentional agency is a necessary condition of creativity. We argue that this requirement, which we call the Intentional Agency Condition (IAC), should be abandoned. We motivate this by highlighting the problems this criterion encounters in the face of recent advances in generative AI, which is ostensibly creative despite being incapable of intentional agency. We present two corpus analyses to illustrate the rapidly increasing tendency of people to predicate creativity to generative AI. In response to th
The rapid advancements in generative AI are forcing a re-evaluation of fundamental human concepts like creativity and intentionality, driven by the increasing sophistication and output quality of these systems.
This re-evaluation impacts intellectual property, ethical frameworks, and the perceived unique value of human contribution, challenging established philosophical and legal definitions.
Our understanding of creativity expands beyond solely human, conscious intentional agency, potentially shifting how we attribute value and ownership in creative works.
- · Generative AI developers
- · AI ethicists and philosophers
- · Creative industries leveraging AI
- · Traditionalists in creative theory
- · Legal frameworks based on human intentionality
- · Philosophical schools denying AI creativity
The definition of 'creative work' will broaden to include AI-generated content, influencing copyright and legal protections.
Public perception of AI capabilities will evolve, leading to greater acceptance of AI as a creative partner or even autonomous creator.
New economic models for valuing and compensating AI-driven creativity will emerge, potentially dislocating existing creative markets.
This signal links to a primary source. Continuum Brief monitors and indexes it as part of the live intelligence stream — we do not republish source content.
Read at arXiv cs.AI