You don't infect anyone in Russia or other CIS countries
This report highlights an ongoing trend within cybercrime where geographical targeting is influenced by geopolitical considerations, a reflection of state-aligned or state-tolerated cyber activities.
A strategic reader should understand the evolving geopolitical fragmentation of the internet and cyber operations, particularly how certain regions become safe havens or off-limits for specific types of cybercrime.
This reinforces the understanding that cybercrime is not uniformly global but can operate with specific, often politically motivated, geographic exclusions, complicating international enforcement and threat intelligence.
- · CIS governments
- · Organized cybercrime groups operating within CIS
- · Ransomware victims outside CIS
- · Cybersecurity firms struggling with attribution
Ransomware attacks continue, but with conscious avoidance of targets within CIS countries.
This selective targeting creates an implicit safe zone for certain malicious actors, allowing them to operate with reduced risk of domestic prosecution or state interference as long as they adhere to 'rules'.
The asymmetry in cyber-enforcement based on geography could exacerbate geopolitical tensions, leading to calls for more unified international cybercrime frameworks or retaliatory measures.
This signal links to a primary source. Continuum Brief monitors and indexes it as part of the live intelligence stream — we do not republish source content.
Read at The Register