“Our commitment to the law of armed conflict is not a constraint on our lethality,” Adm. Brad Cooper, the CENTCOM head, wrote in a memo.
The increased scrutiny on civilian casualties in conflicts, particularly in the Middle East, is prompting military leaders to publicly reinforce adherence to the law of armed conflict.
This emphasizes the ongoing tension between military operations and international humanitarian law, which can impact operational freedoms, public support, and geopolitical relations.
It highlights an internal directive guiding CENTCOM operations, reflecting a continued emphasis on ethical conduct amidst conflict, rather than a significant operational change.
- · International humanitarian law advocates
- · Civilians in conflict zones
- · Opposing forces relying on civilian shields
CENTCOM forces are reinforced in their duty to protect civilians during military operations.
This stance may affect the types of engagements undertaken and the resources allocated for minimizing collateral damage.
It could potentially influence future military doctrine development regarding urban warfare and counterinsurgency, integrating civilian protection more centrally.
This signal links to a primary source. Continuum Brief monitors and indexes it as part of the live intelligence stream — we do not republish source content.
Read at Breaking Defense