SIGNALAI·Jun 19, 2026, 4:00 AMSignal75Short term

ScholarQuest: A Taxonomy-Guided Benchmark for Agentic Academic Paper Search in Open Literature Environments

Source: arXiv cs.AI

Share
ScholarQuest: A Taxonomy-Guided Benchmark for Agentic Academic Paper Search in Open Literature Environments

arXiv:2606.20235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Academic paper search is a core step in scientific research, and LLM-based search agents are emerging as a promising paradigm for iterative, intent-driven literature exploration. However, existing benchmarks are insufficient for systematically evaluating agentic academic search under realistic open literature environments. We propose ScholarQuest, a large-scale, taxonomy-guided benchmark for agentic academic paper search. ScholarQuest is constructed from over 1,000 computer science topics and four representative research intents, including meth

Why this matters
Why now

The development of LLM-based search agents necessitates robust evaluation metrics as these technologies mature and become more integrated into scientific research workflows.

Why it’s important

This benchmark provides a critical tool for measuring and improving the efficacy of AI agents in academic research, which will accelerate scientific discovery and knowledge synthesis.

What changes

The ability to systematically evaluate and compare agentic academic search systems under realistic conditions will lead to more effective and trustworthy AI tools for scientists.

Winners
  • · AI agent developers
  • · Academic researchers
  • · Scientific publishers
  • · LLM providers
Losers
  • · Manual literature review services
Second-order effects
Direct

Improved performance and broader adoption of AI agents for academic paper search will occur.

Second

Accelerated rates of scientific discovery and interdisciplinary connections due to more efficient knowledge access will be observed.

Third

The role of human researchers may shift from extensive search to higher-level analysis and synthesis, supported by advanced AI tools.

Editorial confidence: 90 / 100 · Structural impact: 60 / 100
Original report

This signal links to a primary source. Continuum Brief monitors and indexes it as part of the live intelligence stream — we do not republish source content.

Read at arXiv cs.AI
Tracked by The Continuum Brief · live intelligence network
Share
The Brief · Weekly Dispatch

Stay ahead of the systems reshaping markets.

By subscribing, you agree to receive updates from THE CONTINUUM BRIEF. You can unsubscribe at any time.