Is it too late to stop criminals and American adversaries from exploiting AI to conduct cyberattacks or design novel pathogens? Has regulation kept pace with the threat civilian drones pose to critical infrastructure? AI researcher Lennart Heim, Army drone strategist Paul Lushenko, and CEO of Sentinel Bio Claire Qureshi join Jonathan to discuss the trade-offs between protecting the public and letting the private sector forge ahead. The conversation gets into synthetic DNA, the risk of drones at the FIFA World Cup, and whether the U.S. government should get early access to Silicon Valley’s newe
The discussion on dual-use technologies like AI, synthetic biology, and drones is intensifying as their commercial and military applications rapidly converge and grow more sophisticated.
The inherent dual-use nature of these technologies poses significant challenges for national security, public safety, and regulatory frameworks, demanding urgent strategic attention from decision-makers.
The growing awareness of the immediate threats from these technologies forces a reassessment of the balance between innovation, regulation, and state control over private sector development.
- · Defence Tech Sector
- · Cybersecurity Industry
- · Biosecurity Researchers
- · Government Regulators
- · Unregulated Private Sector Innovation
- · Critical Infrastructure Operators
- · Public Trust in Technology
- · Open-source AI development
Increased government scrutiny and potential regulation on emerging technologies with dual-use capabilities.
Accelerated investment in defensive measures and counter-technologies across cybersecurity, biosecurity, and drone defense.
A potential fracturing of global technology development along national security lines, impacting international collaboration and supply chains.
This signal links to a primary source. Continuum Brief monitors and indexes it as part of the live intelligence stream — we do not republish source content.
Read at War on the Rocks