SIGNALDefence Tech·Jun 11, 2026, 8:00 AMSignal75Medium term

Wargaming for Improved Acquisition: What Does It Take?

Source: War on the Rocks

Share
Wargaming for Improved Acquisition: What Does It Take?

A few months ago, I attended a panel discussion for a wargame simulating rapid industrial mobilization for armed conflict. Conducted by a leading university, with teams composed of former senior defense officials, the game probed how government and industry collaboration would play out given minimal coordination before the onset of a crisis. On the panel, the defense leaders confessed how infrequently they engaged with industry in real life to plan for a national emergency. This declared lack of public-private planning for large-scale conflict matches what I’ve experienced as a defense planner

Why this matters
Why now

The increasing geopolitical instability and the lessons learned from conflicts highlight the urgent need for robust industrial mobilization capabilities.

Why it’s important

A strategic reader should care because ineffective acquisition processes and lack of public-private collaboration pose significant risks to national security and economic resilience during crises.

What changes

This item highlights an increasing recognition within defense circles that current acquisition and industrial preparedness models are inadequate for future conflicts, pushing towards more integrated planning.

Winners
  • · Defense contractors focused on rapid prototyping
  • · Government agencies fostering public-private partnerships
  • · Universities conducting wargames
Losers
  • · Traditional defense acquisition bureaucracy
  • · Companies unable to adapt to rapid mobilization demands
  • · Nations with rigid industrial policies
Second-order effects
Direct

The article directly points to a growing understanding that current defense acquisition processes are too slow and disconnected for real-world crises.

Second

This understanding will likely drive re-evaluations of defense industrial policies and lead to initiatives for greater public-private sector integration in preparedness planning.

Third

Improved acquisition and industrial mobilization capabilities could alter strategic deterrence calculations by demonstrating greater national resilience and capacity for sustained conflict.

Editorial confidence: 90 / 100 · Structural impact: 60 / 100
Original report

This signal links to a primary source. Continuum Brief monitors and indexes it as part of the live intelligence stream — we do not republish source content.

Read at War on the Rocks
Tracked by The Continuum Brief · live intelligence network
Share
The Brief · Weekly Dispatch

Stay ahead of the systems reshaping markets.

By subscribing, you agree to receive updates from THE CONTINUUM BRIEF. You can unsubscribe at any time.